Research roadmap
A twelve-month plan. Bars show intended windows. Status is planned, in progress or done. No venue names are listed.
Agenda status (plan counts)
Bar lengths are counts of programs, roadmap items and planned artifacts marked planned, in progress or done. These are agenda counts, not measured results.
Click a status to highlight matching plan rows. Counts are agenda status, not measurements.
Status: Planned (pattern), In progress (accent border), Done (filled).
View as table
| Status | Count |
|---|---|
| Planned | 12 |
| In progress | 7 |
| Done | 0 |
Twelve-month roadmap
Horizontal bars mark intended start and end months on a 0 to 12 scale. Status labels sit beside each bar, not inside it. Status comes from the data file.
0 to 3 months | 3 to 6 months | 6 to 12 months
AI-Pass submission
Route
0 to 2 months · In progress
Quality orchestration charter and shared invoice benchmark
Assure
0 to 3 months · Planned
Simulation baseline with fault injection (ROS 2, Gazebo)
Physical
0 to 3 months · Planned
Graph-pruning study
Ground
3 to 6 months · Planned
First quality-routing results
Assure
3 to 6 months · Planned
Sovra raw data and scoping
Foundation
0 to 3 months · In progress
Degradation curves and verification methodology note
Physical
3 to 6 months · Planned
Integrated pipeline paper
Route
6 to 12 months · Planned
Open benchmark for extraction or orchestration under constraint
Foundation
6 to 12 months · Planned
Status: Planned (pattern), In progress (accent border), Done (filled).
View as table
| Item | Program | Months | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Pass submission | Route | 0 to 2 | In progress |
| Quality orchestration charter and shared invoice benchmark | Assure | 0 to 3 | Planned |
| Simulation baseline with fault injection (ROS 2, Gazebo) | Physical | 0 to 3 | Planned |
| Graph-pruning study | Ground | 3 to 6 | Planned |
| First quality-routing results | Assure | 3 to 6 | Planned |
| Sovra raw data and scoping | Foundation | 0 to 3 | In progress |
| Degradation curves and verification methodology note | Physical | 3 to 6 | Planned |
| Integrated pipeline paper | Route | 6 to 12 | Planned |
| Open benchmark for extraction or orchestration under constraint | Foundation | 6 to 12 | Planned |
Publication stage gates
Work moves through scoping, data and log review, draft, internal referee-style review, then submission. Counts are shown only when items exist.
Publication stage gates
Publication pipeline: Scoping, Data and logs reviewed, Draft, Internal referee-style review, Submission. Venue names are not listed.
1
Scoping
No items in this stage yet.
2
Data and logs reviewed
No items in this stage yet.
3
Draft
No items in this stage yet.
4
Internal referee-style review
No items in this stage yet.
5
Submission
No items in this stage yet.
View as table
| Stage | Count |
|---|---|
| Scoping | No items in this stage yet. |
| Data and logs reviewed | No items in this stage yet. |
| Draft | No items in this stage yet. |
| Internal referee-style review | No items in this stage yet. |
| Submission | No items in this stage yet. |
Planned artifact releases
- AI-Pass submission package (protocol and logs)RouteIn progressIn progress
- Sovra scoping notes and raw data release planFoundationIn progressIn progress
- Quality orchestration charterAssurePlannedPlanned
- Graph-pruning study packageGroundPlannedPlanned
- Simulation baseline with fault-injection protocolPhysicalPlannedPlanned
Qualitative risks
Qualitative risk map
Qualitative 3 by 3 map of likelihood versus impact. Levels are low, medium and high. No probabilities.
- Safety overclaim
- Dual-use drift
- Dependence on student labor
- Benchmark credibility
- Overclaimed service levels
- Spread across too many tracks
View as table
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependence on student labor | Medium | High | Two people per program, documented pipelines |
| Spread across too many tracks | High | Medium | One lead per track, small physical track |
| Benchmark credibility | Medium | High | Independent adjudication, disclosed construction |
| Overclaimed service levels | Medium | High | State assumptions explicitly |
| Safety overclaim | Low | High | Name the testbed stage for every claim |
| Dual-use drift | Low | High | Written policy before any public release |